What laws and standards is a CEO accountable for? 12 requirements explained one by one

A CEO is the final owner of execution: a manager is a responsible person of the company within the scope of their duties, and a Taiwanese public company's financial reports and internal control statement carry the CEO's name. This page goes through the CEO's legal responsibilities in corporate governance, the TWSE ESG evaluation indicators, and 12 requirements (ERM, ISO 37001, ISO 27001, ISO 22301, trade secrets, the EU CRA, NIS2, the EU AI Act, GDPR, TISAX, digital transformation and AI transformation): what to decide first and what to do first.

Updated 2026-11-03

Direct answer: in corporate governance and regulation, the CEO is the final owner of execution. Under Taiwan's Company Act, a manager is also a responsible person of the company within the scope of their duties and must perform those duties loyally and with the care of a good administrator; a public company's financial reports are signed by the chairman, managers and the accounting head, and the internal control statement is issued by the board and the CEO. The Trade Secrets Act and the Personal Data Protection Act also penalise companies and their representatives. Where the company does business in the EU, NIS2 requires the management bodies of entities in scope to approve and oversee security measures, and the EU CRA and the EU AI Act set fines by worldwide annual turnover. Security, risk, privacy, AI, business continuity, integrity and export-market rules all come back to three decisions on the CEO's desk: which requirements really apply, which comes first, and where people and budget go. Two things to remember: GDPR, NIS2 and the EU CRA have no standalone certificate, and an ISO certificate is not legal compliance.

The CEO in corporate governance: legal responsibilities and the statements you issue

WhoRuleKey wordingWhat it means for the CEO
All companiesCompany Act, Article 8(2)A manager of a company is also a responsible person of the company within the scope of their dutiesWithin their duties, the CEO carries the responsibility of a responsible person
All companiesCompany Act, Article 23(1) and (2)A responsible person shall perform duties loyally and with the care of a good administrator and is liable for damages if a breach causes loss to the company; if a breach of law in conducting company business causes loss to others, they are jointly liable with the companyDecisions and oversight need records that explain them
All companiesTrade Secrets Act, Article 13-4When a company's representative or employee commits a trade secret offence in the course of business, the company is also fined; a company that did its best to prevent it can invoke the proviso"Prevention" needs a system and records
All non-government entitiesPersonal Data Protection Act, Article 50When a non-government entity is fined, its representative, manager or other person with authority to represent it is fined the same amount, unless they can show they fulfilled their duty to prevent the breachPrivacy breaches can reach the representative personally
Public companiesSecurities and Exchange Act, Articles 14(3) and 20-1Financial reports are signed or sealed by the chairman, managers and the accounting head; signers are liable for damages unless they can show due careWhen the CEO signs the financial reports, due care must be provable
Public companiesInternal control regulations for public companies, Articles 9-1, 22 and 24Allocate adequate people and equipment for information security; the self-assessment is the main basis for the board and the CEO to issue the internal control statementAudit results of new systems must feed the basis for the statement
Listed companiesCorporate Governance Best-Practice Principles for TWSE/TPEx Listed Companies, Article 23The duties of the chairman and the CEO should be clearly divided; the two roles should not be held by the same personGovernance and execution kept apart
Listed companiesTWSE Risk Management Best Practice Principles for Listed Companies, Articles 7 and 13A clear risk management statement and commitment from governing bodies and senior management; the board allocates and assigns sufficient and appropriate resourcesRisk management needs management commitment and resources
Listed companiesEthical Corporate Management Best Practice Principles for TWSE/TPEx Listed Companies, Articles 8 and 22Directors and senior management sign a statement of compliance with the ethical management policy; the chairman, CEO or senior management regularly communicate the importance of integrityThe CEO personally signs and communicates
Listed companiesCybersecurity Control Guidelines for Listed Companies, Article 4The security policy is approved by a manager at senior vice president level or above and reviewed regularlyThe approval level for the security policy
Entities in scope of EU NIS2NIS2, Article 20 and Article 32(5) and (6)Management bodies approve and oversee cybersecurity risk-management measures, can be held liable for infringements and must follow training; for essential entities, authorities can request a temporary ban on persons at CEO or legal representative level from exercising managerial functionsWith EU business, first determine whether the company is an entity in scope
Manufacturers placing digital products on the EU marketEU CRA, Articles 13 and 64Design, develop and produce to the essential requirements in Annex I; breaching them can cost up to EUR 15 million or 2.5% of worldwide annual turnoverWhether products can enter the EU market
Providers and deployers of AI systems in the EUEU AI Act, Article 99Prohibited practices up to EUR 35 million or 7% of worldwide annual turnover; other obligations up to EUR 15 million or 3%Determine role and risk tier before using or selling AI

Companies that are not public companies are not covered by the public and listed company rules above and can use them voluntarily. The financial sector has additional rules; for example, at banks and financial holding companies the chief information security officer and the chief risk officer must be at senior vice president level or above, or have equivalent duties. Partial amendments to the Personal Data Protection Act promulgated on 11 November 2025 take effect on a date set by the Executive Yuan; until then the current text applies. Whether any of these liabilities arises is for legal counsel to judge case by case.

TWSE ESG evaluation: the indicators a CEO should watch

The ESG evaluation replaced the corporate governance evaluation from 2026 and covers listed companies. The 2026 edition (the first) has three dimensions and 75 indicators, assesses 1 January to 31 December 2026, and publishes results by the end of April 2027; the 2027 indicators were published on 30 October 2026. Except for S-7, the indicators below have the same wording in both editions.

IndicatorContent (summary)BonusService
G-18Risk management overseen by the audit committee or a board-level functional committee, board-approved policy and procedures, disclosure of the framework and operation, and a report to the board at least once a yearAA item, one extra point overallERM
S-7A board-approved ethical management policy, a full- or part-time unit, implementation and a report to the board at least once a year (2027 wording; split into S-7 and S-8 in 2026)—ISO 37001
S-9Detailed disclosure on the company website of a whistleblowing system for insiders and outsiders covering illegal (including corruption) and unethical conduct—ISO 37001
S-10An intellectual property management plan linked to business goals and its implementation, reported to the board at least once a yearOne extra point overall for TIPS, ISO 56001 or similar third-party certificationTrade secret protection, ISO 56001
S-12Cybersecurity risk management framework, policy, concrete programmes and resources (assessed from the annual report)One extra point overall for ISO 27001, CNS 27001 or similar third-party certificationISO 27001
S-13A personal data protection policy, disclosed with its implementation—ISO 27701, GDPR
S-15A supplier management policy requiring suppliers to follow rules on cybersecurity or privacy, among others—TISAX, NIS2

Three items carry a bonus: G-18 when scored, and S-10 and S-12 with third-party certification. When ranking investments, the bonus is one of the benefits a CEO can quantify. Companies that are not public companies are not evaluated and can use the indicators voluntarily.

The 12 requirements at a glance

RequirementWhat it means for the CEOIs there a certificate?
ERM (COSO ERM, ISO 31000)The backbone for accounting to the board on risk and setting prioritiesNo
ISO 37001Legal exposure to cross-border bribery and customer integrity due diligenceYes, third-party certification; it does not guarantee that no bribery occurs
ISO 27001The first security certificate customers and tenders ask forYes, third-party certification
ISO 22301Recovery times promised to customers must be backed by a BIA and exercisesYes, third-party certification
Trade secret protection and ISO 56001Core technology that holds up in court; a bonus under ESG indicator S-10None for the Trade Secrets Act; ISO 56001 yes
EU CRAFrom 11 December 2027, non-compliant digital products may not be placed on the EU marketNo standalone certificate; conformity assessment by product category and CE marking
NIS2Management body accountability for entities in scope; suppliers take it on by contractNo
EU AI Act and ISO 42001Legal obligations for AI and proof of AI governanceISO 42001 yes; it is not EU AI Act compliance
GDPR and ISO 27701EU personal data, with fines up to 4% of worldwide annual turnover or EUR 20 millionISO 27701 yes; no official GDPR certificate
TISAXCarmakers assess the information security of supplier sitesAn assessment and exchange mechanism, not an ISO certificate; results are shared as labels valid for 3 years
Digital transformationDigitisation that does not widen the attack surface or interrupt core businessPer the service page, benchmarked against ISO 27001 security requirements
AI transformationGovernance first, with AI investment returns that can be trackedISO 42001 can be built alongside; certification is not EU AI Act compliance

Requirement by requirement: what the CEO decides, what comes first, how long it takes

Each service has its own page that answers your role’s questions one by one.

How it fits the systems you already have

New requirements should fold into the internal control, risk management, integrity and security systems you already have, not form a second system.

Existing system and basisWhat you already haveHow the new requirements fold in
Internal control regulations, Articles 22 and 24The annual self-assessment and the internal control statementFeed each management system's internal audit results into the basis for the self-assessment; put findings into existing corrective action tracking
Risk management principles, Articles 13–15Board-approved policy, risk committee and annual reportBring security, continuity, AI, privacy and EU regulatory risk onto one risk map and into one report
Ethical management principles, Article 17A dedicated unit reporting to the board every yearAdd ISO 37001 risk assessments, due diligence and whistleblowing records to the same report
Cybersecurity control guidelines, Article 37Regular security reports to the board or managementPut ISO 27001 audit results and reporting drills into the same report
Annual report regulations, Article 18, item 6The annual report's cybersecurity sectionDisclose resources, programmes and certification results with one set of numbers

These rules apply to public or listed companies; companies that are not public companies are not covered and can use them voluntarily. For each service, see: ERM consulting, ISO 37001, ISO 27001 consulting, ISO 22301, Trade secret protection programme, EU compliance integration.

How Winners Consulting works

This is Winners Consulting's own description; hold us to the questions above, just as you would any other consultant.

Related questions

Request a free mechanism diagnosis

Compliance needs all three; a consultant's value is integration

CRA, TISAX, ISO 27701 and the AI Act are not single technical problems. They are only complete when process, security technology and legal compliance all hold at the same time. Fix only one and the gaps in the other two surface during audits, incident reporting or customer due diligence, and the work has to be redone.

DimensionThe question it answersTypical gap when only this part is done
Process (management system)Who is responsible, what is done, when, where the evidence is, how it improvesTools are in place but nobody runs them on schedule, so there are no records at audit time
Security technologyHow controls are designed and how their effectiveness is verifiedDocuments are complete but the systems do not actually do what they describe
Legal complianceWhich regulation applies, which role you hold, the deadlines and penaltiesControls are built against the wrong regulation or role, so obligations are not covered

Winners' consulting team covers all three dimensions and plans regulatory scoping, process design and technical controls together, so a single body of evidence serves multiple regulations and customer requirements.

Official sources