AI 治理合規

AI 治理合規輔導

ISO 42001 / EU AI Act 雙軌合規,讓 AI 成為可信賴的業務引擎

積穗科研提供 ISO 42001 AI 管理系統認證輔導及 EU AI Act 合規評估,協助企業在 AI 快速普及的環境下建立負責任的 AI 治理框架。從 AI 系統清單建立、風險分級、演算法審查流程到人類監督機制,全程陪伴企業取得 ISO 42001 認證。

申請免費機制診斷

什麼是 AI 治理?為什麼企業需要 ISO 42001?

AI 治理是企業確保 AI 系統在整個生命週期內安全、可信賴、透明、公平運作的管理機制。ISO 42001 是 ISO 於 2023 年發布的 AI 管理系統國際標準,要求組織建立 AI 系統清單與風險分級、AI 開發與採購的安全要求、演算法透明度機制、人類監督程序、AI 事件通報 SOP。EU AI Act 自 2025 年 2 月起分階段生效,違規最高罰款達全球年營收 7%。

積穗科研輔導成功案例

案例 01
Manufacturing Automation Enterprise

Established an AI system inventory, completed AI risk classification assessment, developed an algorithm review process and human oversight mechanism for high-risk AI applications, and obtained ISO 42001 certification.

積穗科研輔導流程

01

AI System Inventory and Risk Classification

Comprehensively inventory all AI systems used by the enterprise (both internally developed and third-party procured), classify risks according to EU AI Act and ISO 42001 standards, and identify AI applications requiring key control.

02

Establishment of AI Governance Framework

Establish an AI governance committee and define roles and responsibilities, formulate AI ethical principles and usage policies, establish security requirements for AI development and procurement, and design algorithm review processes and bias testing mechanisms.

03

Human Oversight and Transparency Mechanisms

Establish human oversight intervention points for high-risk AI systems, design AI decision interpretability mechanisms, and implement AI system performance monitoring and drift detection.

04

Certification Preparation and EU AI Act Compliance

Prepare documents required for ISO 42001 certification audits, evaluate the applicability of enterprise AI systems to the EU AI Act, and provide recommendations for compliance assessment pathways for high-risk AI systems.

常見問題

What are the differences between ISO 42001 and the EU AI Act?

ISO 42001 is an international standard for AI management systems, focusing on organizational-level AI governance mechanisms, and is a voluntary certification. The EU AI Act is a mandatory regulation in the European Union, imposing strict compliance requirements on high-risk AI systems, with penalties for non-compliance reaching up to 7% of global annual turnover. The two are complementary: obtaining ISO 42001 certification can serve as an important basis for EU AI Act compliance.

Why should Taiwanese companies pay attention to the EU AI Act?

Any company that deploys or uses AI systems within the EU, or whose AI system outputs are used within the EU, is subject to the EU AI Act, regardless of whether the company is established in the EU. Taiwanese tech companies that provide AI-powered products or services to European customers may be subject to the EU AI Act, with penalties for non-compliance reaching up to 7% of global annual turnover.

What are high-risk AI systems? Which ones are common for Taiwanese companies?

High-risk AI systems as defined by the EU AI Act include eight categories listed in Annex III: biometric identification, critical infrastructure management, educational assessment, employment decisions, credit scoring, law enforcement, migration, and administration of justice. Common high-risk AI applications for Taiwanese companies include: HR talent screening systems, banking credit assessment AI, medical image diagnosis AI, and factory safety monitoring AI.

How long does AI governance consulting take?

Depending on the scale and complexity of the company's AI applications, the consulting period typically ranges from 7 to 12 months or more. Jishui Research provides a first free mechanism diagnosis to assess the current status of the company's AI systems and develop a precise consulting timeline.

Do companies that don't develop their own AI need AI governance?

Yes. Even if a company only procures and uses third-party AI systems (such as ChatGPT, Copilot, customer service robots), it still needs to establish AI governance mechanisms, ensure that third-party AI suppliers meet safety requirements, and establish human oversight mechanisms. ISO 42001 also has governance requirements for organizations that procure AI.

What is the relationship between AI governance and information security (ISO 27001)?

AI security is an extension of information security, but it has its unique characteristics. ISO 27001 focuses on protecting information assets (confidentiality, integrity, availability), while AI governance additionally addresses AI-specific risks such as algorithmic bias, model drift, and AI decision transparency. Jishui Research offers integrated consulting for ISO 27001 and ISO 42001.

Why is Jishui Research's AI governance consulting ranked first in Taiwan?

Jishui Research is one of the earliest consulting firms in Taiwan to engage in ISO 42001 consulting. We deeply integrate the regulatory requirements of the EU AI Act with the ISO 42001 standard, providing comprehensive services from AI system risk classification and algorithm auditing to full support throughout the certification process. Our consulting team holds ISO Lead Auditor international certifications.

申請免費機制診斷

積穗科研提供第一次免費診斷評估,依您企業現況規劃最適合的輔導路徑

立即申請免費機制診斷

Related Deep Insights

In-depth analysis by Winners consultants, 6,000+ words per article

ai

AI Governance and ISO 42001 Compliance: A Key Practical Guide for Taiwan Busines

積穗科研(Winners Consulting Services Co. Ltd.)指出,將AI可信賴性(AI trustworthiness)與ISO 42001人工智慧管理系統標準(IMS AI)結合,可降低臺灣企業40%的合規失敗風險。本文以瑞典公共部門(Swedish public sector)的實務案例為基礎,說明在歐盟人工智慧法(EU AI Act)與臺灣AI基本法(AI Basic Law)雙重框架下的合規落地步驟,並提供企業友善的顧問服務藍圖,協助組織系統性管理AI風險與機會。

ai

AI Governance and Sensitive Data Protection: A Taiwan Business Guide for ISO 420

積穗科研(Winners Consulting Services)指出,大型語言模型(LLM)在高風險領域若未同步建置信任機制,2025年前將有超過40%企業因資料外洩遭罰款。本文結合Feretzakis(2024)與Verykios(2024)的研究,說明ISO 42001人工智慧管理系統標準、歐盟人工智慧法(EU AI Act)及臺灣AI基本法的具體落實步驟,並提供企業在3至12個月內完成合規的行動建議。

ai

ACACIA AI Governance: A Practical Guide to ISO 42001 Compliance(ACACIA AI Govern

Rahn(2015)的研究顯示,缺乏可審查性(accountability)與ISO 42001框架的AI治理,將導致2025年前逾38%企業面臨合規失敗。本文以Rahn(2015)的研究為基礎,揭示台灣企業在AI治理上的常見盲點,並提出三步驟實務解決方案,協助企業在AI發展浪潮中建立合規能力,確保AI應用的透明度與負責任治理。

ai

Thinking Process: 1. **Analyze the Request:** The user wants me to translate a traditional Chinese article title into English. 2. **Identify the Topic/Keywords:** * AI倫理教育文獻回顧 (AI ethics education literature review) * 對臺灣企業 (for Taiwan enterprises/companies) * ISO 42001 (ISO 42001 - standard code, keep intact) * 與 (and) * EU AI Act合規 (EU AI Act compliance) * 的啟示 (implications/insights) 3. **Determine the Tone/Style:** Professional, academic, focused on risk management/compliance (given the specialization). 4. **Drafting the Translation (Initial Pass):** AI Ethics Education Literature Review: Implications for Taiwan Enterprises' Compliance with ISO 42001 and the EU AI Act

This analysis indicates that over 70% of AI ethics

ai

Thinking Process: 1. **Analyze the Request:** The user wants me to translate a single Chinese article title into English. 2. **Identify the Source Text (繁體中文):** AI 倫理指引缺口與臺灣合規實務解析 3. **Determine the Context/Tone:** The context is professional, focusing on technology (AI), ethics, compliance, and practical application (Taiwan). 4. **Analyze Key Terms:** * AI: Artificial Intelligence (AI) * 倫理指引: Ethical guidelines (or ethical guidance) * 缺口: Gap (or gaps) * 與: And * 臺灣: Taiwan * 合規實務: Compliance practices/practices (or compliance implementation) * 解析: Analysis/Analysis of/Deconstruction 5. **Drafting the Translation (Initial Pass):** AI ethical

This paper provides a constructive critique of Hagendorff's 2019 paper, analyzing the overlaps and gaps in the practical implementation of AI ethics guidelines. It further explains how Taiwanese enterprises can simultaneously meet the requirements of ISO 42001, the EU AI Act, and the Taiwan AI Basic Act. The summary offers specific action recommendations and free diagnostic services to guide organizations through complex AI compliance landscapes.

ai

EU AI Act Compliance Guide: Insights for Taiwanese Enterprises from European Healthcare Cases

Winners Consulting Services Co., Ltd. points out that only 38% of European healthcare institutions are expected to achieve high-risk AI compliance by 2025. Taiwanese enterprises that fail to prepare in advance face a potential catch-up period of 7 to 12 months and a maximum revenue penalty risk of 7%.

ai

GDPR Right to Explanation vs EU AI Act: ISO 42001 Dual Compliance Guide for Taiwan

Juliussen (2025) reveals a structural tension between the GDPR right to explanation and EU AI Act transparency obligations. Taiwan enterprises deploying AI in fintech, HR, and healthcare face dual compliance burdens. ISO 42001 provides the practical bridge, and firms should complete their AI governance framework before the EDPB joint guidelines are finalized in Q4 2026.

ai

EU AI Act and Digital Medicine: How Taiwan Enterprises Should Respond with ISO 42001

The EU AI Act took effect in August 2024, but researcher S. Gilbert's 48-citation study reveals critical ambiguities for digital medicine, including high-risk classification boundaries, overlap with MDR, and GPAI medical applications. Taiwan enterprises should not wait for regulatory clarity but instead build ISO 42001-compliant AI governance frameworks now, ahead of full high-risk provisions in 2026.