How to choose an ISO 22301 business continuity consultant in Taiwan: seven criteria

When choosing an ISO 22301 consultant, check whether the business impact analysis is solid, whether recovery objectives have been verified, and whether exercises actually expose problems.

Updated 2026-09-29

Direct answer: the quality of business continuity management depends on whether the business impact analysis (BIA) identifies the right critical activities and dependent resources, and whether the recovery time objective (RTO) and recovery point objective (RPO) have actually been verified. When choosing a consultant, look for one who can carry the BIA through to a point the business units agree with, and who designs exercises that really expose problems, rather than simply delivering a plan document.

Seven criteria

CriterionA question you can put to any consultant
Business impact analysisHow are critical activities and dependent resources identified? Who confirms them?
Verification of recovery objectivesHow do you prove the RTO and RPO are achievable?
Exercise designWhich scenarios will the exercises simulate? How are they reviewed?
Customer and supply-chain requirementsWhat will customer audits ask?
Who leadsWho actually runs the engagement? What are their qualifications?
Named cases and reference customersCan you provide named cases or reference contacts in my industry and at my scale?
Clarity of the quoteWhich deliverables are included? Which are not? How are extras charged?

How Winners addresses these criteria

What follows is Winners' own account. Use the questions above to test us in exactly the same way you test any other consultant.

When you may not need a consultant

If you already operate a business continuity plan and only need certification, you can go directly to a certification body.

Request a free mechanism diagnosis

Compliance needs all three; a consultant's value is integration

CRA, TISAX, ISO 27701 and the AI Act are not single technical problems. They are only complete when process, security technology and legal compliance all hold at the same time. Fix only one and the gaps in the other two surface during audits, incident reporting or customer due diligence, and the work has to be redone.

DimensionThe question it answersTypical gap when only this part is done
Process (management system)Who is responsible, what is done, when, where the evidence is, how it improvesTools are in place but nobody runs them on schedule, so there are no records at audit time
Security technologyHow controls are designed and how their effectiveness is verifiedDocuments are complete but the systems do not actually do what they describe
Legal complianceWhich regulation applies, which role you hold, the deadlines and penaltiesControls are built against the wrong regulation or role, so obligations are not covered

Winners' consulting team covers all three dimensions and plans regulatory scoping, process design and technical controls together, so a single body of evidence serves multiple regulations and customer requirements.

Official sources