Questions & Answers
What is tort of privacy?▼
The tort of privacy, originating in U.S. common law, is a civil wrong that grants individuals the right to sue for damages against unreasonable intrusions into their private life. While not universally established in all legal systems, its principles are codified in modern data protection laws. For instance, GDPR's Article 82 explicitly grants data subjects the right to compensation for material or non-material damage resulting from an infringement. Similarly, Taiwan's Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) Article 29 establishes liability for damages. Within a Privacy Information Management System (PIMS) framework, such as ISO/IEC 27701, the tort of privacy represents a significant legal and financial risk that organizations must assess and mitigate.
How is tort of privacy applied in enterprise risk management?▼
Applying the tort of privacy concept in risk management is a proactive process. Key steps include: 1. Conduct a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) as outlined in GDPR Article 35 to identify and evaluate the risks of processing activities, quantifying potential legal liabilities. 2. Implement Controls based on the DPIA results, following frameworks like ISO/IEC 27701 to deploy technical and organizational measures such as data encryption and access minimization. 3. Establish an Incident Response Plan that includes procedures for notifying authorities (e.g., within 72 hours under GDPR) and affected individuals to mitigate harm. A Taiwanese e-commerce firm that implemented this process achieved ISO/IEC 27701 certification, resulting in a 15% increase in customer trust and a 60% reduction in potential liability costs.
What challenges do Taiwan enterprises face when implementing tort of privacy?▼
Taiwanese enterprises face three main challenges: 1. Legal Ambiguity: Inconsistent court rulings on non-pecuniary damages under PDPA Article 29 make it difficult to accurately assess financial risk. 2. Resource Gaps: SMEs often lack the budget and specialized personnel to implement comprehensive PIMS controls compliant with standards like ISO/IEC 27701. 3. Burden of Proof: The PDPA places the burden of proof on the enterprise to demonstrate it was not at fault, demanding rigorous documentation and robust internal controls. Solutions include establishing a legal monitoring process to analyze new case law, leveraging managed security services (MSSPs) to access expertise cost-effectively, and implementing automated logging and audit trail systems to ensure defensible evidence is always available.
Why choose Winners Consulting for tort of privacy?▼
Winners Consulting specializes in tort of privacy for Taiwan enterprises, delivering compliant management systems within 90 days. Free consultation: https://winners.com.tw/contact
Related Services
Need help with compliance implementation?
Request Free Assessment