ts-ims

Delphi study

A structured forecasting method using iterative, anonymous surveys with a panel of experts to achieve a consensus of opinion. As referenced in ISO 31010:2019 for risk assessment, it helps organizations systematically gather insights for strategic decisions under uncertainty, such as evaluating emerging technology risks.

Curated by Winners Consulting Services Co., Ltd.

Questions & Answers

What is Delphi study?

The Delphi study, or Delphi method, is a systematic and interactive forecasting technique developed by the RAND Corporation in the 1950s. Its core principle is to achieve a reliable consensus from a panel of anonymous experts through multiple rounds of questionnaires. After each round, a neutral facilitator aggregates the experts' judgments and provides an anonymized statistical summary (e.g., median, interquartile range) back to the panel. This controlled feedback allows experts to revise their opinions based on the group's collective response. The process is iterated until the responses converge. The method is formally recognized in ISO 31010:2019 (Risk management — Risk assessment techniques) as a tool for eliciting expert opinion. It is particularly valuable for assessing risks with high uncertainty and no historical data, such as the long-term impacts of emerging technologies. Unlike brainstorming, its anonymity mitigates the influence of dominant personalities and groupthink, ensuring more objective outcomes.

How is Delphi study applied in enterprise risk management?

In enterprise risk management, a Delphi study is ideal for forecasting emerging risks, market trends, or long-term supply chain disruptions. The practical application involves three key steps: 1. **Define the Issue and Select Experts**: Clearly articulate the assessment topic, such as "the potential risks of generative AI on intellectual property protection over the next five years." Then, select a diverse panel of 5-20 internal and external experts (e.g., legal counsel, cybersecurity heads, R&D leaders, external academics) based on their knowledge and experience, ensuring their anonymity throughout the process. 2. **Conduct Iterative Survey Rounds**: The first round typically uses open-ended questions to gather a broad range of risk factors. Subsequent rounds use structured scales (e.g., rating likelihood and impact from 1-5) and provide statistical feedback from the previous round. Experts are asked to re-evaluate their ratings and justify any opinions that fall outside the group consensus (e.g., the interquartile range). 3. **Analyze and Reach Consensus**: The process concludes when response stability is achieved, indicated by a low variance or a pre-defined level of agreement. The facilitator then compiles a final report identifying high-priority risks, which can improve risk identification completeness by over 20% and provide a robust, defensible basis for strategic decisions presented to the board.

What challenges do Taiwan enterprises face when implementing Delphi study?

Taiwan enterprises often encounter three specific challenges when implementing the Delphi study: 1. **Limited Expert Pool and Anonymity Concerns**: In Taiwan's niche high-tech sectors, the expert community is often small and tightly-knit. This makes it difficult to recruit a sufficient number of independent experts and to guarantee true anonymity, potentially compromising the candor of their feedback. 2. **Cultural Preference for Quantitative Data**: Many organizations have a strong decision-making culture that favors historical data and financial metrics. They may be skeptical of a qualitative, judgment-based method like the Delphi study, viewing it as lacking scientific rigor. 3. **Lack of Facilitation Expertise**: The validity of a Delphi study depends heavily on a neutral facilitator skilled in designing unbiased questionnaires and synthesizing complex feedback. A shortage of properly trained personnel can lead to flawed execution and unreliable results. **Solutions**: * To overcome expert limitations, expand the search to include international academics and retired executives. Priority action: Establish partnerships with industry associations to build an expert database within 3 months. * To address cultural resistance, start with a pilot project on an emerging risk where no historical data exists. Priority action: Select a non-critical strategic issue for a 6-month pilot to demonstrate its value. * To ensure methodological rigor, partner with a specialized consultancy for facilitation and internal training. Priority action: Hold a workshop for key risk personnel within 1 month.

Why choose Winners Consulting for Delphi study?

Winners Consulting specializes in Delphi study for Taiwan enterprises, delivering compliant management systems within 90 days. Free consultation: https://winners.com.tw/contact

Related Services

Need help with compliance implementation?

Request Free Assessment